Category: Legal

Mortgage write-off story maintains momentum

The legal PR work I am doing is continuing to pay off handsomely for Dublin law firm Anthony Joyce & Co, after having Anthony on RTE TV’s main Six One News last week, and getting him a front page splash in Ireland’s best selling newspaper The Sunday Independent yesterday, today his story also featured on page 2 of The Irish Times (see below) following a telephone interview he did as he was cycling around the countryside on Sunday.

Today he also featured heavily in the broadcast media where he was on Newstalk’s Breakfast Show, a national radio station for which he also did a pre-recorded interview on Sunday.  Then he did a live interview for Today FM’s Ray Darcy Show, also a national radio station, the same interview was then also used on the much respected Last Word, hosted by ex-Sunday Tribune Editor, Matt Cooper.

I’ll be adding MP3s of these interviews shortly, meanwhile here’s The Irish Times piece.

The Irish Times article by Kitty Holland (click to zoom).

Mortgage write-off, Anthony Joyce on RTE Six One News

We had a great bit of legal PR for Dublin law firm Anthony Joyce & Co yesterday when Anthony featured on TV in RTE’s Six One News. He was interviewed by Paul Colgan, who recently also interviewed him for RTE1′s Primetime TV show. Anthony was discussing a case where a couple of clients sold their house and were able to get their mortgage lender to write-off the €200,000 balance of their mortgage.

To read how I secured this please click below.

Continue reading “Mortgage write-off, Anthony Joyce on RTE Six One News” »

Irish People’s experience of foreign property investment varies

When I first moved over to Ireland a did bit of work in the overseas property market. I saw how the lack of regulation in the sector meant that a lot overseas property companies were taking advantage of investors and there were very sharp practices.
.
I started to help people analyse their investments and separate the wheat from the chaff as it were – let’s just say there was much wheat to make bread from. The thing that struck was that despite the huge amounts of money involved a lot of people did very little research. We save a lot of people a lot of money including one building who was about to invest over half a million euro with Kendar, the company formerly owned by rogue solicitor Michael Lynn.
.
We also had a number of people who going to buy in risky markets like Dubai and Bulgaria and helped by in low risk cities such as Frankfurt. I spoke to a couple of these investors recently and they are extremely grateful for the advice because their investments have kept their value, whereas they could’ve lost a lot of money if they had gone through with their original intentions.
.
Since then my work has focused on trying to help investors whose developments have run into problems or those that fear they could lose the money they’ve invested. I work with Anthony Joyce & Co to help investors with my role focusing on raising the profile of the legal action in order to bring in more investors, there’s strength in numbers, and also brings pressure to bear on developers and agents through the media, which can often be very effective.
.
Below is an article that recently appeared in The Southern Star, written by Con Power, whom remembered the work I have been undertaking. I also work Appreciating Assets who help investors that have their properties (the lucky ones) sell them on to Russian investors.

Here’s the article. Please click to see more:

Article featuring Simon Palmer in The Southern Star

Kuvera investors success against legal advisers

Anthony Joyce & Co, the Dublin legal firm, received some major success yesterday in their long running high profile case representing the Kuvera Action Group. A decision by the Court in Dublin ruled that most of the 289 investors were entitled to their money back from Seymour Majors, the legal firm that advised Kuvera in relation to development projects in India.

Below are two article from The Irish Times and The Irish Examiner today outlining the case. If you require any further details, then please call Anthony Joyce on 01 4545000. Please click on the image below to zoom.

Article in The Irish Times 8.12.2010

Article in The Irish Examiner 8.12.2010

Erroneous story regarding legal action in Dubai

I was notified today of a story which appeared in relation to a legal client of mine, the Dublin law firm Anthony Joyce & Co, and two groups of investors whom I also represent. The story appeared on AIB’s ForEx news site after it was fed in via a feed from BusinessWorld.com. The story was written by BusinessWorld but with confusion over two different legal groups of investors and two separate actions.

Here are the corrections from the errors in the story below, which has now been taken down by AIBForEx and Business World, but may have been picked up by investors earlier.

1. Anthony Joyce is currently representing a group of investors called KRI, these are investors in the Kensington Royale Development in Sports City. He is no longer representing the Concerned Dubai Sports City Investors Group, more recently known as the Dubai Action Group, and they are in no way connected to the current action being undertaken by the firm.

2. Whilst Anthony Joyce is currently liaising with MED there are no plans for him or any representative of his firm to travel to Dubai.

3. KRI does not consist of two separate groups, from the Republic of Ireland and Britain, they consist of investors from eight different countries across the globe.

4. At the moment no developer in Dubai is being sued by Anthony Joyce & Co, the KRI Group, or the Dubai Action Group / Concerned Dubai Sports City Investors Group.

If anyone requires any details on either of the parties concerned above then please contact Simon Palmer of Republic PR.

This was the story that appeared….

Irish investors sue Dubai developers

A team of lawyers will today travel to Dubai to represent a group of Irish investors – many of them pensioners – who sank their savings in to the dream of a sunshine getaway only to lose out massively when the investment stalled.

The lawyers will talk on behalf of the Concerned Dubai Sports City Investors Group, which was set up last year to represent Irish people who bought off-plan apartments through the now defunct Larionovo property agents.

The five-star project by Middle Eastern Development (MED) was originally scheduled for completion in early 2009.

The law firm Anthony Joyce and Co was retained by the Irish group and by a similar representative group in Britain whose members had paid deposits for apartments in the 252-unit project.

“We have raised our concerns with MED that the project should have been built within the specified timeframe,” said Joyce of the firm.

He also made it clear that the company should not seek more money until work goes ahead.

The lawyer was awaiting instructions from the clients on whether to go ahead with the project or seek their money back, which would involve launching legal proceedings in Dubai against the developer.

The investors are worried that as much as E20m – cash many hoped would fund their retirements – is caught up in Dubai in a “limbo” after the failure of Ennis, Co Clare-based Larionovo last year. The Irish investors in the scheme, believed to number as many as 1,000, have had trouble trying to find out what has happened to their money and gathered together the cash to send out the law firm to try to find out where they stand with regard to their initial investment and the building project’s future – if any. The investors bought into the Sports City scheme, part of a massive two billion sq ft mixed theme park, which developers said would “dwarf Disneyworld”. It promised golf courses, indoor and outdoor stadia, various academies – including a Manchester United soccer academy – as well as swimming pools, health spas and many other facilities. The investors say their last correspondance received from the developers said that the project was “on hold”. However, they fear the developments have actually been cancelled and believe the term “on hold” is being used to avoid refunding them. Sold on a buy-to-let scheme through a network of worldwide agents, investors were assured of eight per cent returns for the first three years. Most of the units were sold in 2006 and 2007 with prices ranging from E168,000 to E280,000. An unnamed Irish investor was quoted in the Dubai press as saying he had reserved a two-bedroom unit in January 2007 and had paid 30pc of the total buying price of around E64,700 but heard nothing from the developer for two years. On a recent visit to see the project, he discovered that the developers had scaled down the dimensions to a one-bedroom unit on the construction drawings he was shown, that too without any prior information, according to Dubai-based online newspaper, Zawya.com. The report said the scheme is still on sale through property Website, Dubaicondoproperty.com.

Ends

A MURKY WORLD – the overseas property business

Never has there been a more apt to describe the overseas property industry, especially in Ireland and the UK. Overseas property was the drug of the Celtic Tiger. When the banks started to approve the release of equity to buy second home everyone jumped on the bandwagon to sell property to the Irish.

The problem was that the Government left in unregulated so anyone could sell property investments worth hundreds of thousands of euro. There were no rules, no qualifications, no professional body and no licenses needed. The guy selling you a two hundred thousand euro could’ve got out of prison for fraud the day before or sold nothing more than washing machines in his life.

Even if you were buying one euro share from a stockbroker he would need to regulated by the financial ombudsman and he could tell you that the share price was going to rise and in fact he even had to warn you that it may go down. This was not the case with overseas property. Agents in this sector would say the property would rise 100% in 5 years, that investors would make X amount of money, and that finance and guaranteed rents were available when there was no way of telling if they would when the development was finished and there was no way of enforcing this.

Many properties were mis-sold due to the lies people were told and it is the agents that have run off with their commissions to their apartments in Peurto Banus (they wouldn’t have dreamt of buying in Dubai or Bulgaria), hoping to wash their hands of responsibility and leave the investors to deal with developers. They agents won’t get away with this law can still take their assets, and their will be fraud cases.

I am currently working on six overseas property legal and litigation cases with the Dublin legal firm Anthony Joyce & Co. Recently The Sunday Business Post did a full page on several of these case in the article below. I have included a link so that it can be viewed on The Sunday Business Post’s website.

http://archives.tcm.ie/businesspost/2010/06/06/story49693.asp

A MURKY WORLD - the overseas property business

Sunday, June 06, 2010 - By Ian Kehoe Chief News Correspondent

In his native India, Probir Chatterjee is a little-known figure. Yet, over the coming days, more than 250 Irish people will file into the Carlton Hotel at Dublin Airport to hear the accountant speak.

The reason? Chatterjee’s firm, Smart Investments, is attempting to kick-start a number of stalled property developments in Dubai.

His audience will be made up of Irish investors who put down deposits for three schemes in Dubai’s Sports City complex – Bermuda Views, Eagle Heights and Profile Residence.

Chatterjee is likely to have an attentive audience as he outlines a plan to take over the delayed developments and complete them, giving certainty to the investors at last.

Through an Irish-based selling agent called Larionovo, hundreds of Irish people invested money in apartments and villas in the three developments.

Enticed by glossy brochures and talk of a guaranteed return, many put their life savings into the property projects. Others stepped up to buy multiple properties, paying out hundreds of thousands of euro upfront.

In late 2008, Larionovo collapsed into liquidation. The Dubai developments, which were being spearheaded by a local firm, stalled. Since then, the investors have struggled to get any information about the development or the whereabouts of their funds.

For all concerned, the Dubai investment dream has turned into a nightmare.

‘‘A few years ago, I asked Larionovo about the progress of the development,” said Tony Hynes, a Dublin businessman who invested in one of the schemes.

‘‘I was shown a picture of a six-storey building that was almost complete. A few months ago, I went out there myself.

All I could find was a hole in the ground. I don’t know what building they showed me, but it certainly was not mine.”

Hynes is the chairman of an action group set up last year to investigate the Dubai debacle and try to recover funds from the project. It has discovered a maze of companies, with intricate shareholdings and impenetrable operations.

‘‘Look, I accept there is a risk associated with any investment, but we were given lots of promises that turned out to be lies,” said Hynes. ‘‘We were told it was backed by the Dubai government.

Not true. We were told our money was in a safe account and was not being touched. Not true. It was actually being used to fund the development.”

Hynes has already given up hope of getting his money back from Dubai.

He said the best option was finding a partner like Chatterjee to finish the development.

‘‘I am not getting my money back, so I am trying to get the keys instead,” he said. ‘‘Next week’s meetings are crucial. Hopefully, in two years, it will all be over and I will be in possession of the apartments. Hopefully.”

If a deal with Smart Investments can be agreed, Hynes and his action group could yet salvage something. Others might not be so lucky.

During the years of economic boom, Irish people were among the biggest buyers of foreign property in the world.

The numbers vary, but industry estimates put the number of Irish-owned foreign properties at somewhere between 150,000 and 250,000.

They ranged from condominiums in Chicago to villas in Cape Verde, from Bulgarian flats to penthouses in Poland. Geography was no restriction – properties were purchased in places as diverse as Dubai, Morocco, Hungary, Turkey, India, France, Italy and Portugal.

But as the economic climate has changed, a series of overseas property ventures have come undone. Some developments, like those in Dubai, have failed to materialise. Others have plummeted in value, leaving thousands of investors nursing big losses.

A murky world – that’s how lawyer Tom McGrath described the overseas property business. During the boom years, he provided legal advice for people buying abroad.

Now the market has soured, he is spending much of his time helping clients pick up the pieces.

‘‘People bought into the market, they bought into the flash property shows, the fancy talks, the gushing newspaper articles,” said McGrath, a partner with McGrath O’Donnell & Associates in Dublin. ‘‘But at the bottom of it all, there was simply no regulation.

‘‘People were doing things they would never dream of doing if they were investing in Ireland. I know one person who bought an apartment in Bulgaria from the back of a fruit van.

People ran away with themselves,” he said.

In the case of Kuvera Ireland, around 250 Irish investors bought into the sales pitch. The company took over a hotel in Dublin 4 on September 15, 2007, to launch plans for two luxury developments in India called Mountain View and Orchard View.

Kieran Murphy, the man behind Kuvera Ireland, spent the day meeting potential customers and introducing them to Dr Ajit Jha, the boss of Kuvera India and his partner on the ground.

The show and the figures must have been impressive -Kuvera raised €8.9million for the apartment scheme in Rudrapur, a special economic zone in north India.

Kuvera Ireland brokered the deal and investors were told that contracts for the building work existed between the investors and a construction company called VG Buildtech.

Between them, Mountain View and Orchard View were to comprise 580 apartments. As of last week, the site consisted of a boundary wall with some small preparatory works. Nothing had been built.

‘‘Two weeks into the project, Kuvera knew there was a problem.” said John Plaice, who invested in the scheme and now chairs an action group set up to recover money from Kuvera. ‘‘The problem was very simple. Foreigners could not buy properties there, but they tried to work around it with leaseholds and so on. There were literally problems from day one.”

The fall-out from Kuvera ended up in the High Court in Dublin, where an order was obtained freezing Murphy’s assets.

A settlement was eventually reached between Murphy and the investors, under which he agreed to hand over assets.

Under the settlement, the investors were to take possession of properties at a golf resort in South Africa, five British properties and €143,00 0 from a South African bank account.

Murphy’s shares in Kuvera India and equity in VG Buildtech were also to be ceded.

Almost a year on, the transfers of the various assets are close to completion.

However, the Kuvera case shed startling light on how some property deals were structured.

Under the so-called ‘Kuvera reward programme’, investors were promised flights and holidays at five-star hotels if they convinced others to invest in the company’s Indian developments.

‘‘The deal was a good one if it had worked,” said Plaice. ‘‘But it did not work, and we are still getting to the bottom of what happened, and why it happened.

Money that should have been in an escrow account was used on sales and marketing.

The whole scheme was based on getting more people involved. The market slowed and no new investors were found. The whole thing became exposed. There was a huge element of trust in the investment.

We were badly let down.”

Anthony Joyce, a Dublin solicitor, represented the Kuvera action group and has since spent a lot of his time dealing with disgruntled investors in other property ventures.

‘‘If there is a fraud or a perceived wrongdoing, we can take a legal course of action,” according to Joyce. ‘‘But in lots of cases, I simply can’t help people.

The scheme is legitimate, but individuals can’t afford to make the payments. ‘‘But there is a difference.

At least you get the keys if you keep on paying. But there are a lot of cases where you pay your money and you might end up with nothing.”

Two weeks ago, Joyce was retained by Irish investors concerned about construction delays at the Kensington Royale development in Dubai Sports City.

The five-star, 18-storey development of 252 units is being developed by Middle East Development in the United Arab Emirates, and was originally due to be completed early last year.

Joyce is also acting for investors who put money into a proposed €100million resort in Cape Verde.

Flash Developments, which is headed by Dublin developer Ciaran Maguire, received deposits from more than 200 Irish and British investors for apartments and villas in the planned Palm View Resort.

Following a 16-month delay in the project getting full planning permission, a number of the investors put together an action group to try to recover their money.

Ten days ago, the investors were stunned when KPMG was appointed as liquidator over Flash.

Maguire said that the development was going ahead, stating that all the ‘‘contracts, development lands and credit lines’’ had been transferred to another company called the Ciaran Maguire Group.

Maguire said that Flash Developments was ‘‘simply a sales and marketing company’’, and its liquidation would not have any effect on the development.

KPMG has initiated a full investigation. ‘‘I have absolute sympathy with a lot of investors,” said Joyce.

‘‘They got caught up in genuine investments that went wrong. Many schemes were plausible on paper. They checked out. But they were undone by the market.”

Often, the court is the place of last resort.

In recent days, 39 investors launched proceedings against Simple Overseas Properties, an Irish property firm, in relation to deposits which were taken for properties in developments in Morocco and Spain. That case, and others like it, highlighted a major problem, according to experts – a stark lack of regulation.

‘‘Some of it is real Wild West stuff,” said Paul McCann, head of specialist advisory services with accountancy firm Grant Thornton.

‘‘There is an assumption that Irish overseas property firms are regulated. Even travel agents are bonded. But it is not the case.

‘‘I think it is now incumbent on the government to introduce regulation, or force companies to be bonded.

Alternatively, the various representative bodies need to start enforcing strict guidelines.

Deposits should not be allowed to be used by developers as cash flow.”

The government is understood to be looking at the system, in an effort to introduce some new checks and balances.

But for people like John Plaice, Tony Hynes and the thousands who have seen their investments evaporate, it could well be too late.

Ends

Getting a case admitted to Dublin’s Commercial Court can mean a much quicker legal process

Guest post by solicitor Anthony Joyce of Dublin legal firm Anthony Joyce & Co.

Question: I have heard that having a case admitted to the Commercial Court can be a much faster method of obtaining a resolution – is this true? And what are the conditions that must be met to have a case admitted?

Answer: Yes it is true, if you are currently involved in a commercial dispute, having your case admitted to the Commercial Court (also known as the High Court Commercial List) can allow you to resolve a dispute more quickly and effectively than through the normal High Court procedures. The Commercial Court is effectively a fast track of the High Court reserved for commercial cases.

Cases which are admitted to the Commercial Court start and finish in a short time frame, on average, within twenty one weeks of the transfer of proceedings.

An application to have a case admitted to the Commercial Court can be made at any time, but the rules of the Court provide for a stay to be put on proceedings for a period of 28 days to allow mediation, conciliation or arbitration to take place.

In order to gain entry to the Commercial Court the dispute must fall into one of the following categories:

1. Current financial disputes where the claim, or counterclaim, is not less than €1,000,000 can be admitted to the Commercial Court. However, there has been some speculation that the minimum entry level of may be increased to €2,500,000.
2. Any application or proceedings under the Arbitration Acts where the value of any claim or counterclaim is not less than €1,000,000.
3. Any legal dispute relating to a patents, a trade mark, copyright, industrial design or a case relating to ‘passing off’, for example where a competitor has tried to ‘pass off’ your product as their own.
4. Any appeal or application for a judicial review of a previous decision or determination that judge considers it suitable for admission to the Commercial Court.

There is also a catch all condition that can allow any case to heard where the Judge considers it appropriate for entry into the Commercial Court. But, whilst it does have a broad discretion to admit cases, it must be remembered that it is at the discretion of the High Court and even if your case falls into one of the above categories this does not automatically entitle you to entry.

Once your case has been admitted the it runs quickly because of the rules which provide for what is termed ‘detailed case management’, this ensures a strict timetable for any cases has to be met by all parties involved and they are fined if these deadlines are not met – this is why the Commercial Court moves so much faster than the High Court

The Commercial Court in Dublin has been a great success. It has garnered an international reputation as a Court that is simple to access and where disputes can be settled in a swift and cost effective manner compared to Courts abroad.

The success of the Commercial Court has promoted Ireland as a country where any commercial disputes arising can be resolved quickly and effectively. An efficient legal system and settling of disputes in this manner is vitally important in order to be able to attract international business. The Commercial Court is something that Ireland should be very proud off.

by Anthony Joyce, Principal, Anthony Joyce & Co, Dublin – www.anthonyjoyce.ie

Ends

Kuvera Action Group meeting tonight City West

This is a reminder to all the members of the Kuvera Action Group that there is a full meeting of the Group tonight, 15th December at the City West Hotel, Saggart, Dublin. The various strands of the case are at an important point and, therefore, as many people as possible are requested to attend tonight’s meeting, which will start at 7.30pm.

This will include a full feedback following the trip to India last week, which was very successful as a lot of information came to light that needs to be given to the Group.

The Group will also have some new Court action that they need to be aware of.

Full minutes will be submitted for anyone who can’t make the meeting.  Please let me know if anyone has any questions on 0851 341 761.

Ends

Simple Overseas Properties Asilah Beach Morocco

Dublin legal company Anthony Joyce & Co has been appointed by buyers who bought property in the Asila Beach Morocco in the Asilah Marina Golf resort through Irish overseas property company Simple Overseas Properties.

Dublin solicitor Anthony Joyce is asking anyone who is concerned about their purchases to contact him on 01 4545 000 or go to http://www.anthonyjoyce.ie

Ends

Revenue increasing VRT on the sly

For a while I have been monitoring the price of VRT needed to pay on a car that I want to import into Ireland. This weekend I went back to check again because since the beginning of the July C02 emissions are now taken into account. I was shocked to find out that the Revenue had increased the ‘open market selling price’ of the car in question by 20% since I last checked in November despite the fact that the details I included had an extra 10,000 miles on the clock .

This is nonsensical and smacks of the Revenue abusing their power to manipulate VRT receipts.  Anyone with the slightest bit knowledge of the Irish second hand car market knows that the bottom has fallen out of the value of Irish second hands cars, which are now generally worth a lot less than they were in November.

It appears that the Revenue are trying to manipulate their position by virtue of the fact that they can decide on whim what the supposed ‘open market selling price’ of car is so that they can increase the VRT take without anyone noticing.

VRT is a completely inequitable tax, which is illegal under EU law. Within the EU there should be a free movement of goods, this means that any Irish resident has the right to go to any other EU country, buy a car and bring it back to Ireland without being penalised by the Irish Government and having to pay an import tax, which is what VRT is.

VRT is currently being challenged in the EU Court. It unfairly protects the Irish car industry that rips off Irish consumers by charging them way more than or EU counterparts. Ironically the car dealers blame VRT for keeping the prices high. In their defence the car dealers are forced to add VRT into the price. This is one of the reasons why Irish cars always have such low specifications to our UK neighbours because dealers here take cars with no extras in order to keep the price lower.

The Revenue Commissioners don’t divulge how they calculate the open market vehicles of vehicles, which leaves the system open to manipulation. But, in blatant cronyism they also add VAT onto the second hand open market value, in order to support the dealers. This means that if you bring a car into Ireland from the UK, the Revenue calculates the 28% VRT by deciding what the open market price of your car plus an additional 21.5% VAT.

Thankfully some common sense on the issue is emerging. With car sales drastically reduced the governments overall VRT take is reduced greatly because it comes mostly from new cars that dealers import so they are looking for a more stable way of taxing cars. No doubt the Irish dealers have also been lobbying the government to remove VRT in order to boost their sales. The article below appeared in today’s Sunday Tribune and relates to advice by the Commission on Taxation, which has advised the Government to tax driving rather than the cars themselves.

The Commission suggests a congestion charge for Dublin city centre, similar to that imposed in London and also higher fuel duty. These options would also garner favour from environmentalists they are likely to reduce the overall level of journeys taken.

If brought in this system would be more akin to the European model and would be a big improvement to Dublin city centre.  It should also be rolled out to regional cities. It certainly makes more sense than the current system.

Sunday Tribune (August, 2009.)

Congestion charges or petrol tax to replace VRT

Radical moves proposed by Commission on Taxation include levy on cars in Dublin city

Emmet Oliver, Business Editor

Vehicle registration tax (VRT) should be abolished on all cars sold in Ireland and replaced with a UK-style congestion charge or an increased tax on petrol, according to proposals submitted to government by the Commission on Taxation.

The radical measures are aimed at “taxing driving, rather than taxing cars” according to the report of the commission, which goes to the Department of Finance this week. If the government implements the measures it would represent a major change in taxation and transport policy.

The recommendations, which could provide an unprecedented boost to the faltering Irish motor trade, would involve charging drivers a fee when they enter designated and often congested urban areas. For example, in Dublin the charge would most likely kick in if a car travelled within either of the two main canals.

The report comes to the conclusion that VRT is a “lumpy tax” that is dependent on one large purchase being made by a consumer. A tax on driving and use of the road network would throw the net much wider and mean the government would receive large revenues even if car sales slumped as they tend to in recessions.

“It will provide the exchequer with more stable sources of revenue and is part of the general drive to broaden the tax base,” a commission member told the Sunday Tribune.

The London congestion charge levies drivers who enter certain defined zones from the hours of 7am to 6pm with a charge of £8. Residents who live within the congestion-charge areas and those driving green vehicles are either exempt from the levy or can avail of a discounted rate.

A set of cameras have been placed around central London to take images of drivers’ registration plates, and a number of payment methods, online, by phone or in a shop, are available.

The motor industry desperately wants a car-scrappage scheme introduced in the December budget, a measure it says could help to salvage large parts of the sector, but the idea of abolishing VRT could provide an even bigger lift, although petrol taxes or congestion charges are not popular with the motor industry. VRT is the main reason why cars are more expensive in Ireland than in other EU countries. The prices of new cars here increase by up to 30% when VRT is applied.

Commission members who spoke to the Sunday Tribune said the measure was also designed to have a ‘green’ impact.

“The idea is to lower people’s use of their car and get them to switch to public-transport alternatives.

“Just taxing the car itself doesn’t do that, because once somebody has paid the tax they can drive it as much as they like.”

A congestion charge, which the report refers to, would be more popular than a general increase in petrol costs, which are already high based on recent hikes in oil prices. While the government’s tax receipts for 2009 remain under pressure, the importance of VRT has hugely dropped over the last six months.

Net VRT receipts in the first half of the year amounted to €269m, compared to €866m for the same period last year, according to Department of Finance figures.

Ends

WordPress Themes | © Republic PR Dublin public relations Ireland 2012 |